Social shock as a beneficial predictor out-of suicidality one of people who have PTSD

Social shock as a beneficial predictor out-of suicidality one of people who have PTSD

Table 2 shows that the 76 individuals in the PTSD group were significantly younger and had a higher percentage of females compared to those in the TEHC group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of years of education. Individuals in the TEHC group reported that they had experienced an average of 1.4 (SE = 0.7) traumatic events, while those in the PTSD group reported experiencing a significantly higher average of 2.2 (SE = 1.3) traumatic events (t = 5.363; p < .001). Among the participants diagnosed with PTSD, 46 belonged to the NIT group, while 30 belonged to the IT group. Among the participants in the NIT group, 28 (60.9%) were female, whereas 26 (86.7%) were female in the IT group, exhibiting a significantly higher ratio than that of the NIT group (? 2 = 5.875, p = .015). The mean age of the IT group (43.4 years) was significantly lower than that of the NIT group (51.4 years; t = 2.417, p = .018). No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of years of education.

Logistic regression was conducted with suicidality as the dependent variable and the diagnosis of PTSD, age, sex, and years of education as independent variables. Individuals in the PTSD group were 7.851 times more likely to have suicidal ideation (95% confidence interval [CI] = [4.725, ]; p < .001), times more likely to plan for suicide (95% CI = [5.671, ]; p < .001) and 9.776 times more likely to attempt suicide (95% CI = [4.512, ]; p < .001) compared to the TEHC group.

The brand new BFI-eleven results were compared within PTSD and you may TEHC organizations. The fresh new PTSD group had a somewhat straight down extraversion (F = six.78; p = .009) rating however, high neuroticism (F = 9.40; p = .002) and openness (F = eight.85; p = .005) ratings compared to those from the TEHC classification. Both teams just weren’t rather various other in terms of the agreeableness and you will conscientiousness score. No significant distinctions was indeed found in the five size of the BFI-eleven get involving the NIT plus it organizations inside the PTSD category.

A great logistic regression are presented for people with PTSD, having suicidality since founded varying and kind of injury, ages, sex, and numerous years of education since independent variables to analyze the end result from social stress to your suicidality

People regarding It classification were step 3.643 moments very likely to provides self-destructive ideation (95% CI = [step one.226, ]; p = .020) than those on NIT category. Additionally, the type of stress didn’t assume people tall improvement in suicidal believed or decide to try.

Character situations since predictors regarding suicidality certainly one of people who have PTSD

Logistic regressions was basically used to determine in the event that BFI-11 results predict suicidality inside individuals with PTSD and to identify perhaps the type of trauma got a good moderating affect for example dating. All in all, three regressions have been performed; each logistic regression is actually did which have possibly suicidal ideation, planning, or test since situated varying and an incredible number of the four personality affairs, the type of traumatization, interactions amongst the sort of injury and five character factor scores, ages, gender and years of knowledge given that separate variables. One of several five identification factors, conscientiousness predicted lower suicidal ideation (possibility ratio [OR] = 0.454; 95% CI = [0.163, 0.974]; p = .044) and check out (Or = 0.070; 95% CI = [0.011, 0.459]; p = .006). Agreeableness forecast lower suicidal attempt (Or = 0.131; 95% CI = [0.031, 0.562]; p = .003) together with a tendency out of anticipating self-destructive ideation (Otherwise = 0.454; 95% CI = [0 www.datingranking.net/cs/matchocean-recenze.201, step 1.027]; p = .058). Lastly, visibility to relax and play predict all the way down self-destructive test (Otherwise = 0.193; 95% CI = [0.039, 0.951]; p = .043). More over, high relationships had been discovered between your style of shock as well as the conscientiousness get getting self-destructive ideation and attempt, between your version of upheaval and you will agreeableness score to own self-destructive ideation and check out and you may amongst the particular shock and transparency rating getting self-destructive sample regarding PTSD category (Desk step three).

Leave A Comment

Contactez-Nous

Tanger, MAROC
(+212) 643-844648
Lundi - Samedi 8h - 18h (Dimanche Fermé)